Anxious–Avoidant Personality Style

Style, Disorder, and the Space Between

The PDM-3 says anxious personality styles are easy to recognize from the neurotic through the borderline range, and it describes how they change across the levels of organization (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676):

• Healthy. At the adaptive end, the PDM-3 describes sensitivity, empathy, a few close friendships, and the capacity to pursue interests in depth (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 488). A person may have a specific fear without the rest of life being organized around it. McWilliams describes a woman who, “despite having a phobia, [was] otherwise a paragon of mental health” (McWilliams, 2011, p. 54).
• Neurotic. At first such people may look obsessional or hysterical, depending on how they try to handle their fear. The difference is that they are “chronically aware of their anxiety because their defenses fail to keep it outside conscious awareness.” Anxiety may attach to specific situations they avoid, or float freely with no clear object (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).
• Borderline. The lower the level of organization, the more likely that annihilation anxiety, a terror of falling apart or being destroyed, dominates (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676). Describing the maladaptive end of the pattern in young people, the PDM-3 notes that avoidance can progress until they are “essentially isolated,” with fears of annihilation, of falling apart, and of losing needed people, and with serious difficulties in regulating emotion and in mentalization (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, pp. 487–488).
• Psychotic. At this level people become so filled with dread that they rely on primitive externalizing defenses, and the PDM-3 suggests their psychology may be better understood as overlapping with paranoia (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

The point is not the fear itself but how it is organized. McWilliams warns against diagnosing from the symptom: a phobia in someone with a depressive or narcissistic personality “is a different phenomenon from a phobia in a characterologically phobic person” (McWilliams, 2011, p. 12). She recalls how developmental theory helped explain why one woman with phobias seemed to be clinging to sanity by a thread, another was “oddly stable in her phobic instability,” and a third was otherwise very healthy (McWilliams, 2011, p. 54).

The style becomes a disorder when avoidance is rigid and pervasive, when it extends across people, places, and situations, and when it costs the person the life they want. The PDM-3 notes that in anxious–avoidant personalities, shyness and embarrassment are more pervasive and persistent than in social phobia alone (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 935). The suffering is often loneliness: the PDM-3 quotes Segal and colleagues’ description of older adults with this pattern as “isolated but desperately lonely, too shy to seek warmth and comfort from others” (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 936).

In the manuals, avoidant personality disorder belongs to the DSM’s Cluster C, alongside dependent and obsessive–compulsive personality disorders (Lampe & Malhi, 2018); the American Psychiatric Association describes it as “extreme shyness related to low self-esteem and sensitivity to rejection and criticism from others” (American Psychiatric Association, 2024). It is also one of the six disorders retained in the DSM’s alternative dimensional model (Lingiardi & McWilliams, 2026a, p. 7). ICD-11 has dropped the named personality types in favor of a severity rating and trait qualifiers; the old ICD-10 “anxious (avoidant)” type maps onto the trait domains of negative affectivity and detachment (Bach & First, 2018). Phobias and social anxiety are diagnosed as symptom disorders, not personality. Counterphobia has never appeared in any edition of the DSM (Mundo, Muzi & Lingiardi, 2026, p. 799).

Inner World

The central tension is between desire and safety. The PDM-3 describes people with this pattern as “more concerned with avoiding harm than pursuing desires,” so that their choices are shaped by efforts to avoid perceived dangers. They tend to ruminate, replaying conversations; they are prone to shame and embarrassment; they often feel like outsiders; and they may find it hard to acknowledge what they want. Some cling to routines or struggle to make decisions. Anxiety may also show up in the body, as panic attacks, worries about ordinary aches and pains, or stress-related physical symptoms (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 678).

Many feel inferior, inadequate, and inhibited, and have trouble recognizing and describing their feelings. Cognitive theorists, the PDM-3 notes, emphasize difficulties in identifying anxiety-laden thoughts, linking them to their triggers, and stepping back to see them from a little distance (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676). Leigh McCullough’s research group coined the term “affect phobia” for people who are frightened of their own emotional life (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

Temperament matters. The PDM-3 lists shyness, fearfulness, an exaggerated startle response, tearfulness, and social withdrawal as early precursors, and notes that such children have been described as “slow to warm up” (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 487). Research reviewed by Lampe and Malhi proposes high harm avoidance, low novelty seeking, hypersensitivity, and an overactive behavioral inhibition system as temperamental factors in avoidant personality, and suggests that it shares negative emotionality, behavioral inhibition, and shyness as vulnerabilities with social anxiety (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). The PDM-3 adds that the proximal source of characterological anxiety may lie in difficulties regulating emotion, reflecting coping strategies or defenses that never fully developed to soothe ordinary developmental fears (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, pp. 676–677).

The pathogenic beliefs, in the language of case formulation, are that the self is incompetent and fragile and the world dangerous and unsafe. Because avoidance prevents the person from ever testing those beliefs, they harden into the organizing core of the personality (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 488). There is often a magical element too: a feeling that one will be safe as long as one keeps away from certain things (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

Self-esteem tends to be low and easily hurt. Lampe and Malhi suggest that the “malignant self-regard” described in some depressive and vulnerable narcissistic styles, with its shame, beliefs of personal inadequacy, and difficulty expressing anger, is often present in avoidant personality as well (Lampe & Malhi, 2018).

Defenses

The signature strategy is avoidance, both behavioral and verbal: staying away from feared situations, and changing the subject whenever something disturbing comes to mind (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677). The PDM-3 notes that these defenses only partly work, which is why the anxiety stays conscious (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

• Displacement and symbolization. In the classical account of phobia, free-floating anxiety is transformed through repression, displacement, and projection into a specific fear that symbolizes the underlying conflict. The advantage is that a specific danger can be avoided, where raw anxiety offers no escape (Mundo, Muzi & Lingiardi, 2026, pp. 799–800). McWilliams lists displacement and symbolization as the defenses that “suggest phobic attitudes” (McWilliams, 1999, p. 90).
• Inhibition and constriction. Wishes and impulses are held back, sometimes so thoroughly that the person limits their life emotionally and intellectually (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 488; McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 678).
• Intellectualization and rationalization. These are prominent when the style blends with obsessional traits, as in the PDM-3 case of Martin described below (Lingiardi & McWilliams, 2026b, p. 32). In older adults, avoidance and phobias may be rationalized to justify withdrawal (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 936).
• In the counterphobic version: denial of fear, acting out that discharges dread before it can be felt, and a sense of omnipotence or invulnerability (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, pp. 489–490).

At the psychotic level, the PDM-3 describes reliance on primitive externalizing defenses (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676). On the healthy side, an anxious temperament can support anticipation, the mature capacity to foresee difficulties and prepare for them emotionally.

Relationships

The defining paradox is wanting connection and fearing it. The PDM-3 says adolescents with this pattern “desire relationships with others but are terrified of being criticized, humiliated, and rejected” (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 487). Avoidance then becomes self-reinforcing: avoidance is reinforced by the relief it brings, which means more avoidance and fewer chances to form new relationships or to learn that the world is less dangerous than it feels (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 488). When alone, anxious people tend to feel small and threatened and to seek protection from those they see as powerful; in therapy they may connect in a submissive, apprehensive way (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

As for origins, the PDM-3 offers theories, not blame. People with anxious personalities often describe caregivers who, because of their own anxiety, could not comfort them, convey security, or support their sense of agency (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, pp. 676–677). The adolescent chapter describes families, often with an anxious parent, organized around containing shared anxiety, keeping outsiders at a distance, and limiting exposure to awkward or frightening situations (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 487). Early “inner working models” of relationships, in Bowlby’s phrase, shape how much closeness feels tolerable and whether others seem safe or frightening (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 487).

Attachment researchers have filled in the picture. Kim Bartholomew distinguished two ways of avoiding intimacy: a fearful style, with “a conscious desire for social contact which is inhibited by fears of its consequences,” and a dismissing style, marked by “defensive denial of the need or desire for greater social contact” (Bartholomew, 1990). As Lampe and Malhi report, she regarded the fearful style, in its extreme form, as typical of avoidant personality disorder, and research suggests that critical, demeaning, and neglectful early caregiving may increase the risk of developing a fearful attachment style (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). Encouragingly, Mikulincer and Shaver’s work, as the PDM-3 summarizes it, suggests insecure attachment can slowly shift toward security in a long, devoted relationship, including intensive psychotherapy (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

Clinicians often feel protective toward people with this style; the PDM-3’s adolescent chapter describes “warm parental–protective feelings” early in treatment (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 488). The PDM-3 also reports preliminary research suggesting that clinicians develop both parental and disengaged feelings toward anxious patients, and mainly parental feelings toward phobic ones (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

In Therapy

Transference means the feelings and expectations from earlier relationships that a person brings to the therapist. Countertransference means the therapist’s emotional response. Both can tell the therapist something useful.

The PDM-3’s adolescent chapter notes that, at first, people with this style may feel embarrassed, ashamed, or uncomfortable, because the intimacy of therapy itself is frightening. Once they trust that they will not be rejected, they may idealize the therapist as a source of safety, even a “savior,” and become very anxious around breaks (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 488). Some hope, magically, that the therapist will have a formula that dissolves the fear without their having to face it. Many arrive already taking anti-anxiety medication, and the PDM-3 urges caution with such prescriptions for characterological anxiety because of the risk of addiction (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

Therapists may find themselves becoming anxious in response. With patients at the borderline or psychotic level, this can reach a level of dread that pushes the therapist to step out of role and “do” something to relieve the patient (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677). A common well-meant mistake is trying to argue the person out of their fear, convincing them it is out of proportion. The PDM-3 notes that this can leave patients more embarrassed, ashamed, and frustrated (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, pp. 488–489). It is vital, it says, that clinicians not act out a rescue fantasy (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

What tends to help, according to the PDM-3: keeping confidence in the person’s ability to develop their own ways of tolerating and reducing anxiety; helping them put words to vague, unformulated states; asking for specifics when they announce sweeping dangers (“And then what would happen?”); and, once the alliance is secure, helping them face what they fear, whether it lies outside or inside them. Exposure-based techniques and mindfulness practice can be useful additions (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677). At the same time, the PDM-3 argues that characterological anxiety needs a deeper form of therapy than exposure alone (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676). McWilliams adds that, whether treatment uses desensitization, psychodynamic mastery, or both, it is essential to know the exact pathogenic belief attached to a feared situation (McWilliams, 1999, p. 191).

Giving up the magical ideas that come with anxiety can bring a period of grief or depression in treatment (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 678). For avoidant personality disorder specifically, a review found that graded exposure, cognitive behavioral therapy, social skills training, psychodynamic psychotherapy, schema therapy, and supportive–expressive therapy have all been reported to help, though studies are few (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). With older adults, the PDM-3 recommends combining assertiveness with empathy for their fears, and notes that some anxious older people instead become overly dependent on the clinician, using submission to ward off anxiety, a sign of the need for contact hidden behind the avoidance (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 936). For adolescents, it suggests that both psychodynamic work (on separation anxieties, conflicts about anger, and embarrassment about sexual feelings) and cognitive-behavioral methods (social skills training, gradual exposure, anxiety management) may help (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 489).

Counterphobic people rarely come to therapy, probably because asking for help feels too vulnerable; they may come when a partner urges them or after a traumatic event. The PDM-3 advises working slowly and tolerating their bravado for some time before gently moving toward an acknowledgment of ordinary human fear (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, pp. 677–678). Counterphobic adolescents often treat the therapist with a dismissing, detached attitude, and clinicians tend to feel anxious and irritated, as if carrying the fear the young person denies (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 489).

Variations

• Phobic. Fear attaches to specific objects or situations. McWilliams writes that when people have patterns of displaced fearful preoccupations in many areas of life, “we consider their character to be phobic” (McWilliams, 2011, p. 140).
• Avoidant. Fear centers on social evaluation: embarrassment, humiliation, rejection (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 678).
• Chronically or globally anxious. Some people feel a free-floating anxiety with no idea what frightens them (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).
• Counterphobic. The PDC-3 lists counterphobic as the subtype of this style (Gordon & Bornstein, 2025). Counterphobic people organize themselves around defenses against fear: they seek out danger, thrive on risk, and can be unnervingly calm in peril. Having disowned their anxiety, they tend to make their therapists anxious on their behalf (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, pp. 677–678). The PDM-3 notes that mild counterphobia is common and normal in adolescents testing their limits (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 489). McWilliams describes counterphobic acting out as typical of hysterical people, who “approach what they unconsciously fear” (McWilliams, 2011, p. 317).

Common blends include the obsessive–compulsive style (rigid routines and rumination can serve to manage anxiety), the dependent style (anxious people often seek a protector), the depressive style, and the somatizing style, since anxiety may be felt in the body.

How Different Thinkers See It

Sigmund Freud: anxiety and its defenses

Freud first thought that repression caused anxiety: bottled-up impulses created chronic tension. Later he reversed cause and effect, regarding repression and other defenses as the result of anxiety rather than its cause (McWilliams, 2011, pp. 128–129). Psychoanalytic writers often relate anxiety to Freud’s basic “danger situations”: loss of the person one depends on, loss of their love, damage to the body, and loss of one’s own conscience’s approval (Mundo, Muzi & Lingiardi, 2026, p. 797). The older diagnosis of “anxiety hysteria” survives in the PDM-3’s observation that anxious people can at first look hysterical (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

Anna Freud: three sources of anxiety

Anna Freud distinguished dread of being overwhelmed by one’s own impulses, “signal anxiety” that warns of a danger met before, and superego anxiety, the fear of punishment for forbidden wishes. McWilliams reads these as roughly matching developmental stages, and stresses that what kind of anxiety someone suffers cannot be inferred from their outward situation (McWilliams, 1999, p. 80).

Otto Fenichel: the counterphobic attitude

Otto Fenichel wrote the classic paper on “the counter-phobic attitude” (Fenichel, 1939), on people who seek out what they fear instead of avoiding it. The PDM-3 describes this behavior as an apparently unconscious effort to master a fear rather than endure it passively, and adds that such repetitions rarely lead to real mastery and tend instead to be compulsively repeated (Mundo, Muzi & Lingiardi, 2026, p. 799).

Karen Horney: moving away

As later reviewers summarize her work, Horney’s three neurotic trends were moving toward, against, and away from people (Coolidge & Segal, 1998; Coolidge et al., 2001). In this site’s reading, the third trend, detachment, is the closest Horneyan relative of this style, though it does not by itself separate fearful avoidance from schizoid withdrawal. That distinction came later.

Theodore Millon: active versus passive detachment

Millon drew that distinction. As Lampe and Malhi summarize his view, he saw the essence of the avoidant personality as a longing to relate that is frustrated by oversensitivity and the anticipation of humiliation, leading to an “active-detached” withdrawal, and contrasted it with the “passive-detached” schizoid pattern of low arousal and little interest in relationships. His work was instrumental in bringing avoidant personality disorder into DSM-III in 1980 (Lampe & Malhi, 2018).

Attachment research

Bartholomew’s fearful–dismissing distinction (Bartholomew, 1990) does similar work in attachment terms, and research has linked the fearful style to avoidant personality disorder (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). Mikulincer and Shaver suggest most characterologically anxious people would have shown anxious attachment in early childhood (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 677).

Affective neuroscience and self psychology

The PDM-3 draws on Panksepp’s finding that the brain systems behind terror of destruction (FEAR) and separation distress (PANIC/GRIEF) are different, and on Kohut’s “disintegration anxiety,” the terror of the self fragmenting. In severe characterological anxiety, all these kinds of anxiety may be present at once (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

Social anxiety research

Research psychology has mostly studied avoidant personality alongside social anxiety disorder. The prevailing “severity continuum hypothesis” treats avoidant personality as a severe form of social anxiety, but large community studies find that about two-thirds of people with avoidant personality disorder do not meet criteria for social anxiety disorder, and some researchers argue the two differ in genetic risk, core self-concept, and cognitive concerns (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). The PDM-3 sides with continuity across a broad anxious spectrum, based on research with the SWAP (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

Examples

Martin

The PDM-3’s clinical illustration for adulthood describes Martin, a man in his late thirties from a family of high socioeconomic status. As a teenager he avoided activities because he feared others’ judgment, and he coped by reliving experiences in his mind. Over the years he had episodes of exam anxiety, a panic attack on a train followed by avoidance of public transport, and later a withdrawal into his home with obsessional thinking. His psychiatrist felt alternately cast as savior and silently challenged. The PDM-3 formulation names his central concern as “safety versus danger,” with avoidance, displacement, intellectualization, and rationalization as his main defenses, at a low neurotic level, with an anxious–avoidant and phobic personality predominant and obsessive–compulsive features. With combined treatment, he gradually resumed contact with the outside world.

Lingiardi & McWilliams (Eds.), PDM-3 Online Supplement: Clinical Illustrations (2026), pp. 30–32

The woman who feared not being seen

McWilliams describes an agoraphobic woman who said she feared going out because others would see her as “a nervous wreck” and scorn her. As they worked together, a deeper fear emerged: that she might not be noticed at all. Given how neglected she had been as a child, being unnoticed felt like being exposed to life-threatening danger. McWilliams concluded that “she needed to desensitize herself not to negative attention but to lack of attention,” and they built a graduated program around that.

Nancy McWilliams, Psychoanalytic Case Formulation (1999), p. 191

Mr. Woodhouse (fiction)

Jane Austen’s Mr. Woodhouse, the heroine’s father in Emma, is “a nervous man, easily depressed; fond of every body that he was used to, and hating to part with them; hating change of every kind.” Marriage, as “the origin of change,” is always disagreeable to him, and he has been “a valetudinarian all his life.” Austen also makes clear that he is “everywhere beloved for the friendliness of his heart.” He is a comic, affectionate portrait of a life shaped by the avoidance of change.

Jane Austen, Emma (1815), Vol. I, Ch. 1

How It Differs From Look-Alikes

Schizoid style

Both withdraw. The PDM-3 puts the difference this way: people with schizoid personalities are deeply conflicted about their attachment needs, while avoidant people want social contact but are afraid of it (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 935). Anxious–avoidant adolescents usually have a few friends; schizoid adolescents may have none (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, p. 490). McWilliams notes that many analytic clinicians nonetheless regard avoidant personality disorder as a nonpsychotic version of schizoid character (McWilliams, 2011, p. 197), while research has found a low correlation between the two DSM diagnoses (Lampe & Malhi, 2018).

Social anxiety disorder

Social anxiety disorder is a symptom pattern; the personality style is broader. In anxious–avoidant personalities, shyness and embarrassment extend to people, places, and situations in general (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 935), and many people with avoidant personality do not have social anxiety disorder (Lampe & Malhi, 2018).

Obsessive–compulsive and hysterical styles

Higher-functioning anxious people can look like either. The difference is that obsessional and hysterical defenses keep anxiety out of awareness fairly well; in the anxious style they do not, and the person knows they are anxious most of the time (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

Posttraumatic fear

McWilliams draws a clear line: avoiding bridges after a terrible accident on a bridge is posttraumatic. Avoiding bridges because they unconsciously symbolize life’s transitions, in a magical hope of staying safe from aging and death, is phobic (McWilliams, 2011, p. 140). The PDM-3 agrees that fear based on a real negative experience is better seen as posttraumatic (Mundo, Muzi & Lingiardi, 2026, p. 801).

Paranoid style

At the psychotic level, pervasive dread is managed by primitive externalizing defenses, and the picture overlaps with paranoia (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676).

Realistic caution in later life

The PDM-3 cautions that shrinking social networks, care around health, discomfort with new technology, and embarrassment about declining senses are ordinary parts of aging, not evidence of an avoidant personality (Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, p. 935).

History

Anxiety was central to psychoanalysis from early on. Freud’s early theory held that repressed impulses turned into anxiety; his later theory treated defenses as the result of anxiety rather than its cause (McWilliams, 2011, pp. 128–129), and Anna Freud followed him in describing “signal anxiety” (McWilliams, 1999, p. 80). The old diagnosis of “anxiety hysteria” reflected how easily anxious personalities could be mistaken for hysterical ones (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676), and the classical psychoanalytic account treated phobia as anxiety that had been displaced onto a symbol (Mundo, Muzi & Lingiardi, 2026, p. 799). In 1939 Otto Fenichel described the counterphobic attitude (Fenichel, 1939).

The avoidant personality as a psychiatric category is much newer. Theodore Millon distinguished the avoidant from the schizoid personality, and his work was instrumental in adding avoidant personality disorder to DSM-III in 1980 (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). It appeared there in the “anxious or fearful” cluster alongside dependent, compulsive, and passive–aggressive personality disorders (Coolidge & Segal, 1998). DSM-III-R emphasized social anxiety in its criteria, and DSM-IV moved back toward Millon’s emphasis on fear of rejection and feelings of inadequacy (Lampe & Malhi, 2018). The relationship to social anxiety disorder has been debated ever since.

ICD-10 called the parallel category “anxious (avoidant)” personality disorder. ICD-11 replaced the named personality types with a severity rating plus trait qualifiers (Bach & First, 2018), while the DSM’s alternative model kept avoidant personality as one of its six types (Lingiardi & McWilliams, 2026a, p. 7).

On the psychodynamic side, McWilliams did not give phobic, counterphobic, or chronically anxious people a chapter in her 2011 book, and referred readers to the PDM (McWilliams, 2011, p. xiii). Drawing on research with the SWAP that found a broader spectrum of personalities organized around anxiety (McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, p. 676), the PDM-3 now describes a single anxious–avoidant and phobic style with a counterphobic subtype, together with versions for adolescents and older adults (Tanzilli & Sharp, 2026, pp. 487–490; McWilliams & Shedler, 2026, pp. 676–678; Del Corno & Plotkin, 2026, pp. 935–936).

Sources

• American Psychiatric Association. (2024). What are personality disorders? Retrieved from https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/personality-disorders/what-are-personality-disorders
• Austen, J. (1815). Emma. (Project Gutenberg eBook #158.) https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/158
• Bach, B., & First, M. B. (2018). Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. BMC Psychiatry, 18, 351. doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3
• Bartholomew, K. (1990). Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(2), 147–178. doi:10.1177/0265407590072001
• Coolidge, F. L., Moor, C. J., Yamazaki, T. G., Stewart, S. E., & Segal, D. L. (2001). On the relationship between Karen Horney’s tripartite neurotic type theory and personality disorder features. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(8), 1387–1400. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00120-3
• Coolidge, F. L., & Segal, D. L. (1998). Evolution of personality disorder diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 18(5), 585–599. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00002-6
• Del Corno, F., & Plotkin, D. (2026). Personality styles and disorders in older adults—POA axis. In V. Lingiardi & N. McWilliams (Eds.), Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (3rd ed., pp. 926–956). Guilford Press.
• Fenichel, O. (1939). The counter-phobic attitude. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 20, 263–274.
• Gordon, R. M., & Bornstein, R. F. (2025). Psychodiagnostic Chart–3 (PDC-3): The operationalized PDM-3, adult version [Rating form]. sites.google.com/site/psychodiagnosticchart
• Lampe, L., & Malhi, G. S. (2018). Avoidant personality disorder: Current insights. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 11, 55–66. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S121073
• Lingiardi, V., & McWilliams, N. (2026a). Introduction. In V. Lingiardi & N. McWilliams (Eds.), Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (3rd ed., pp. 1–17). Guilford Press.
• Lingiardi, V., & McWilliams, N. (Eds.). (2026b). Online supplement to Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (3rd ed.): Clinical illustrations. Guilford Press. guilford.com/companion-site
• McWilliams, N. (1999). Psychoanalytic case formulation. Guilford Press.
• McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
• McWilliams, N., & Shedler, J. (2026). Personality styles and disorders—P axis. In V. Lingiardi & N. McWilliams (Eds.), Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (3rd ed., pp. 651–708). Guilford Press.
• Mundo, E., Muzi, L., & Lingiardi, V. (2026). Symptom patterns: The subjective experience—S axis. In V. Lingiardi & N. McWilliams (Eds.), Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (3rd ed., pp. 760–874). Guilford Press.
• Tanzilli, A., & Sharp, C. (2026). Emerging personality styles and disorders in adolescence—PA axis. In V. Lingiardi & N. McWilliams (Eds.), Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (3rd ed., pp. 468–522). Guilford Press.