Show full content
How much can we ever really absorb in a moment? In the fleeting moment the wheel of the evolution of music keeps turning and some things get left behind. In a documentary about Vashti Bunyan, a commentator suggests that it is because of her record not doing well at the time that it became so popular at present; because it is new to us, unlike other things we have heard, and also from the 1960s. This means, in a sense, that undiscovered music from the past can show us alternative timelines of existence.
And how exactly did this main timeline get created? I am fascinated by the women musicians now in their 70s, 80s and 90s who are active at present and reclaiming their creative expression. What percentage of women were in the top 40 in the 1960s? The ones that were there likely had to go through some male gatekeeper. And to this day, it is clear that a majority of producers are men. Most women musicians still probably have to rely on a male to produce their music, in the commercial world at least.
Vashti said that it looks and sounds like it was her at the time, but it wasn’t; “I wasn’t living in the hills, I was living in my head.” I guess this too points to the way that music is shaped by decisions around commercialization, meaning another mind is filtering the way the creative vision is being actualized. This mind could be seen as a watering down to fit the collective taste of the majority, given a position focused on marketing music. Some of this vision is also likely to be the individual’s own perception; that invisible gatekeeper. Vashti came back to making music after a 30 year hiatus, and learnt to produce.
Mary Hopkin says similar things as she talks of her experience making music different to her creative vision, back when the Beatles ‘discovered’ her, and her own venture into studio producing. She said she gave it all up, producing in big studios with “men in white coats”, so she could make music she wants. It is also the development in technologies that allow this to happen. Mary now produces music in her little home studio overlooking a garden, and said she thought all creative things should be that way.
There is such tension, though, between being a musician who wants to just create and the realities of living in the world we live in- how can you eat and have shelter if no one pays? Do we have time to create or must we spend time doing things that make more money? There is a darkness in the human experience of feeling deep in your soul that your only purpose is to make music, and having no one listen or take notice. It is connected to a bigger overall idea of communicating and not being understood. In the modern world, this is a process that moves through and is obfuscated by the capitalist machine, as certain cultures and identities get curated by the majority power as being ‘in’ or ‘out.’ It is a machine that sucks in the will of the people, but it is also one that shapes it to its own ends. It is a mish mash of ideas; that only a chosen few deserve to create or are born with the special power of music making, that you must only create if it makes money and you become ‘big’ or else you must be quiet. It swallows up the sensitive souls in its path, who simply have to create. Vashti Bunyan slipped into a great depressive period after not succeeding. At 18 she got offered a record deal to sing someone else’ s song and enjoyed promoting it, compromising with a cover but aspiring to a music career singing her own songs… but she said her songs were very quiet which meant it was hard to find those to promote it, she said they were looking for people who “looked good in a ballgown.” And things went quiet; Vashti was “left spinning.” She left everything in modern society to travel the roads in a horse and cart.
Connie Converse’s life story has similar themes of melancholy in the face of not being understood. As told by established author Howard Fishman, Connie was leaving New York to give up being a singer songwriter just as Bob Dylan and Joni Mitchell were arriving on the scene. The author offers the compelling argument that Connie’s music was just ahead of her time and people were not yet ready. And too a factor was Connie potentially not being palatable to the acceptable presentation of a woman. They say she was scruffily dressed and fairly uncouth in manner. The saddest part is that after shifting into the completely different world of academic journals, and facing similar challenges, Connie got in her car at 50 and has never since been found (there is also a documentary). Recently, her family released her music which was, in the day where self producing was less common, recorded on tape at parties but also by Connie herself. Listening to it, I get a haunting sense of both connecting with the music of my elderly relatives and seeing a new world where someone precedes Joni Mitchell, and at the time prior to Joni’s experience with no money giving away an accidental pregnancy that the father didn’t want to know about, manages to get it known that the 1960s movement of sexual liberation was just for the men.
On the radio it was reported that in her recent release, Yoko Ono said that she was worried about her voice cracking, but then decided that other older women’s voices crack too, meaning she was just showing the human experience. It is refreshing to find small reminders that at essence we create because we are human.
How I wrote this:
Do people want to read this? I’m just trying it out as I continue to read AI critical commentary and consider what it means to create. It seems that in these times the process starts to matter more. So, here is the story about the creation of this blog post..
I found out about Connie Converse and Vashti Bunyan through the algorithm on Tidal, which put together a daily playlist based on my listening choices. I have always been dubious as to the ethics of streaming and especially algorithms as opposed to human curated music, but this was the heyday of algorithms for me, discovering some obscure music like the more well-known things I listen to (such as Joni Mitchell and Mary Hopkin) and reading about the backstory. I already knew about Mary Hopkin through growing up with her record, but it was perhaps the algorithm that found me the music she created in her 80s. But I stopped following the daily listen algorithmic playlist when I noticed how much 2026 music was on it and started increasingly noticing AI Music popping up in Tidal. I’m not sure if this coincided with Tidal’s recent replacement of human workers with AI as well. I decided that where music came from was important to me (which was, to be fair, the reason why I chose a Tidal Subscription instead of Spotify in the first place) and I was going to go back to solely following curators to dictate my listening habits.
I went down the rabbit hole on DuckDuckGo, learning about Connie Converse and Vashti Bunyan, watching documentaries and reading the book about Connie. I also learnt several of their songs. I had inspiration and took down some ideas either in my notebook or on the notes on my phone (including in the middle of the night). After letting it settle for a while I was inspired to work on it further after launching into the Fediverse to have discussions about AI, Music and Capitalism- subjects that I also spend time consuming audiobooks about in my sleep. As the ideas took shape in the process of me working them into coherent sentences, I recalled a YouTube interview with Joni Mitchell I watched a while ago (while she was still in her 80s), her song Little Green and Karen Haye quoting Yoko Ono on my radio tuned to 95 BFM in Auckland, New Zealand.





























































































































































































































Idyllic Bush
Nasturtium
Abandoned Toilet Seat in Stream.
Bus Window
Construction Workers
Important Building Rescued from SkyCity Fire
Tongan Flag.