GeistHaus
log in · sign up

The Goose Gazette

Part of leaflet.pub

stories
List of Surveillance Companies
Big brothers are always watching (and selling your data to ICE)
Show full content
Introduction

In the year 2025, many people have grown complacent about their privacy, they figure their data is already everywhere and they have nothing to hide. The current administration is turning this idea on its head, though, as more and more previously innocuous activity becomes criminalized, and an unprecedented expansion of the police state takes place before our eyes.

While protecting yourself from surveillance is a whole complicated issue, one of the first steps is awareness. So here is a (likely extremely incomplete!) list of major surveillance companies that violate people's fourth amendment rights on a daily basis.

These companies thrive on obscurity, the longer they can remain legally unchallenged and avoid personal responsibility for the harm they cause, the more money they can make for their investors. So if you don't support being perpetually watched by the government your tax dollars fund, let your voice be heard and call them out!

PenlinkTeam
  • Peter Weber, CEO

  • Udi Levi, CMO

InvestorsTrusted Innovation for Intelligent Decisions | Penlink

Penlink’s platform simplifies data for precise insights, supporting investigations. Trusted Innovation for Intelligent Decisions.

Babel Street
  • Mass surveillance company that tracks and verifies identities

Team
  • Benji Hutchinson, CEO

  • Shon Myatt - President and CTO

Homepage

When every second counts, Babel Street delivers mission-grade risk intelligence to give you the full picture across identities, threats, and supply chains.

Venntel
  • Previous contract with CBP

  • The only company too cowardly to publicly list their team on their website ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Venntel

Built by former intelligence analysts and commercial data experts, Venntel is committed to addressing the world’s most complex challenges with precision and insight. We leverage advanced data analytics and deep industry expertise to deliver actionable intelligence and drive meaningful decision-making for businesses and organizations globally.

Flock Safety
  • Major surveillance company LARPing as ALPR software

  • Illegally shares data across jurisdictional lines

  • Access often illegally given to federal agencies

TeamInvestors
  • Andreessen Horowitz

  • Greenoaks Capital

  • Bedrock Capital

  • Meritech Capital

  • Matrix Partners

  • Sands Capital

  • Founders Fund - Peter Thiel

  • Kleiner Perkins

  • Tiger Global

Shaping the Future of Safety, Together.

To solve and eliminate crime – you need evidence. Protect your community, business or school 24/7 with coverage that never sleeps.

Sources
https://goose.leaflet.pub/3m24f7kmlz22n
Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World Review
A ★★★★★ review of Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World (2023)
Show full content

Palo Alto is a gripping novel that forces the reader to contend with the bloody history of violence and exploitation that led to the current technocratic boom town of Silicon Valley. An incredible patchwork of stories woven together to paint a damning picture of a place built on unrelenting greed, racism, and disregard for the working class.

Quite long, but I would recommend it to anybody, especially people working in tech.

View more on PopFeed.social:

A ★★★★★ review of Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World (2023)

Palo Alto is a gripping novel that forces the reader to contend with the bloody history of violence ...

https://goose.leaflet.pub/3lzphlwfem22b
I am smarter than ChatGPT-5 mini
In which GPT-5 mini completely loses its mind trying to solve a logic puzzle I solved in 6 minutes.
Show full content

Many of you may already be familiar with Clues by Sam, but for those of you who are not, it is a very fun game. Basically you are a detective in a room of suspects trying to figure out how many of the people are criminal and innocent. You start with one clue, and each time you correctly deduce a suspect's status, you are rewarded with a new clue (or a useless statement). Important facts about the game are that the suspects cannot lie and all statements must be logically sound, you can't just go accusing people of crimes (or innocence) without airtight reasoning.

As I was sitting on the toilet yesterday playing this game, I found myself thinking "Wow this particular day was very easy, I wonder if a robot can do it". For a reference, here was my result from yesterday:

I made one small counting error but was able to pretty easily complete the puzzle in under 7 minutes.

Let's See How the Bot Does

I made one small counting mistake but was able to pretty easily complete the

This morning, I woke up bright and early and, not knowing what to do with myself, decided to see how the bot does on the same puzzle I did yesterday (I did it at like 11pm PST so it was already today's puzzle).

I wrote up this prompt for ChatGPT and hit enter, but after about five minutes of waiting, nothing really happened and I gave up

You are a detective in a room of 20 suspects in a criminal case, where many of them likely were involved. You will be provided the layout of the room and then one statement given by a given suspect. You must then choose one suspect to label definitively as criminal or innocent given the information you have, which will reveal that suspect's statement. You must continue labeling suspects as innocent or criminal until you have decided on all 20. You may not make guesses, you must be sure that each suspect is the label you choose for it. Please briefly explain your reasoning for each decision in less than two sentences. Here is the layout of the suspects and their occupations Alice (Singer) || Betty (Judge) || Chris (Cop) || Donna (Judge) Erwin (Painter) || Floyd (Sleuth) || Gus (Sleuth) || Hank (Judge) Isaac (Painter) || Katie (Sleuth) || Martin (Singer) || Nancy (Cop) Olive (Coder) || Paula (Coder) || Sofia (Coder) || Terry (Doctor) Vicky (Builder) || Wally (Painter) || Xavi (Builder) || Zach (Doctor) You know that Xavi is innocent Xavi says: "Gus is one of two or more criminals neighboring Floyd"

To keep things simple, I then remembered that my kagi.com subscription includes some basic LLMs, so I chose ChatGPT5 mini as it was the biggest ChatGPT model available to me (I am not a serious AI researcher, feel free to try this with better models if you care)

We are off to the races! The first guess was predictably correct. Considering the clue explicitly fingers Gus as a criminal, I suspected this wouldn't be too hard.

Immediately afterwards, I ran into a small but predictable hiccup, as I forgot to clarify in my initial prompt that the criminals tell the truth and it assumed they would lie.

Things actually went quite well from here for a bit, I wondered for a moment if LLMs were actually really well suited to this sort of thing, but then the first inkling of a problem appeared.

Told that "the only innocent below Hank is above Zach", ChatGPT incorrectly assumed that I meant directly above Zach. This was it's first mistaken accusation of the game. It course corrected pretty quickly, though and got two more suspects right.

For some reason, though, it really wanted to accuse Terry. So it tried again:

It began to have a bad time at this point. I realized that I could have been clearer about the meanings of words like "neighbors", but clarifying at this point did very little.

It immediately went and just guessed that Betty was innocent, before guessing that Nancy was a criminal, both of which are not guaranteed by the state of the board, and were basically guesses.

From here, ChatGPT could make no progress. I don't know if it is it's small context window or what, but it seemingly proceeded to forget the entire state of the board and the majority of all previous clues.

But not before it tried one sneaky little trick. You see, this is not just ChatGPT, it is Kagi Assistant, which uses the model under the hood but has access to search abilities.

So like anybody perplexed by a puzzle they seemingly cannot crack, ChatGPT went and tried to search for the answer. It didn't help though. I think all the extra information just confused it's context window even more.

Conclusions

I tried a bit further to get ChatGPT on track, but ultimately got nowhere. It seemed to completely forget where people were on the board along with their guilty status, and I felt like continuously re-adding the state w

https://goose.leaflet.pub/3lxal7n5gtk25
The Subtle Genius of Anisota
Slowcial media in an era of constant hustle
Show full content

this post is being made on leaflet instead of my blog as an experiment, and to see how it shows up on anisota, i will mirror it to my main blog shortly afterward.

First Impressions

I've been following dame for quite some time, since twitter was still Twitter and not a nazi echo chamber. When they mentioned they were working on a social media client, I will hesitantly admit I was not especially excited. There are so many social media clients, I thought, I really do not need another one.

Some time passed and eventually anisota became a large proportion of dame's posts. I began to grow increasingly curious, and eventually it was released privately to dame's Patreon. I am not sure how many people know this about me, but I used to work (and at some point would like to continue to work) in cybersecurity, so I thought I would take a shot at getting into anisota before its official release. It worked, and I managed to make this post.

Shortly after making the post, I sort of forgot about it altogether, swept up in a delirious haze of social media, friend obligations, and job applications.

Look Again

At the time I first looked at anisota, I spent quite a bit of effort setting up my proxy and manually editing network requests, which made accessing the site feel like more of a technical accomplishment than anything. I wasn't really in the mood to use social media and probably especially not in the mood to learn how to use an arcane, confusing form of it.

Luckily, Dame just announced opening anisota to the public, so I immediately went to check it out. The interface was the same, a sort of strange dark sparsely populated with small buttons and serif text

Hesitantly, I began to look around. The first thing I noticed is how strange it felt to use. Coming from modern web apps where everything is smooth scrolling, pre-loaded in the background, carefully rendered to avoid page breaks, anisota felt strange and empty, every interaction felt like it took an eternity, especially stuff like opening profiles and liking posts. So many things are hidden within menus that it forces pretty much any interaction with others to require multiple levels of intentional actions. You can't just click the comment button and start typing.

At first, I felt deeply uncomfortable using the app, like I had entered a physical space full of objects I didn't recognize and don't know how to use. But slowly, I began to feel comfortable swiping around, viewing profiles, even commenting on posts. I find these animated glow effects really beautiful and simple, the way they pulse is very calming.

Then, as quickly as I had grown to enjoy anisota, I ran out of stamina. The buttons no longer worked, the site became dead and inert. "What a strange thing for a website to do," I thought. But I put my phone away and went to do something else.

Later, upon logging back in, I noticed my stamina had recovered to something like 22%. Looking around I noticed something else. Posts felt different on here. Surrounded by other people, in a constant noisy feed, angry, political, or advertising posts don't feel so strange. Their individual impact is reduced to nearly zero by their surrounding content. On anisota, however, every rant, every news article hit like a hammer to my skull. I find myself inclined to unfollow people quite a bit more simply to preserve my happy space. Logging into deer again (another Bluesky client), I found myself struck at how loud it felt, something I had hardly considered before.

All this led me to a conclusion: If a few hours of using this website could force me to dramatically rethink my relationship to social media, it must be doing something right.

Learning to Love the Moths

Since yesterday, I have posed myself a challenge. I will only use Bluesky via anisota for the next week. I want to immerse myself in this strange world and see how it feels.

I have installed it as a web app on my phone homepage and have been super impressed how well it almost feels like a native app when you do that.

Qualms and Quibbles

Broadly, I hope I hope I have made it clear that I really like anisota and think it is a super impressive (and ambitious) project to completely design a frontend with no resemblance to the original.

I do have some minor quibbles though. I want to make clear these are not dealbreakers, just minor nuisances that don't feel intentional.

  • Tapping on cards feels too easy - By this, I mean that if you tap anywhere on the card it advances to the next post. In my mind, tapping on the left of the card should go to the previous post, and its a strange bit of asymmetry that you can only go forward in this way.

  • Reposts are not presented very well - When someone I follow reposts someone else, I feel like the subject is more the person I follow than the originemal poster. Furthermore, sometimes I want to unfollow the reposter or at least view their profile, which is made difficult by them just being a tiny name on the screen.

  • I don't find items very interesting - This might just be a very early release issue and maybe Dame has a big long-term plan for items, but to me they seem pretty random, perhaps even AI generated en masse. I do like the moths though, finding those is always a joy.

Curious and CuriouserThings I am looking forward to

Overall, I feel like a mostly have a good handle on how anisota works and feel comfortable using it. There are a few oddities that I am hoping to see developed further / understand more.

  • The sItemsound generator - This is definitely one of the more hit features of anisota. I love it on my computer, but don't typically use it on my phone. I am curious how the soundscape collection will change over time.

  • Items - I mentioned them in qualms, but I could see a world where they feel more useful and interesting than they do now.

  • Moths - It would be so cool if i could see a photo of the moths I have collected.

  • Leveling up - Through using anisota, I've unlocked a few features and settings, I wonder what else there is left to unlock at this point.

  • Reactions / Lexicon extensions - As mentioned in the header, I am writing this on leaflet because anisota has a leaflet integration. It also shows dame's cancellation lexicon and can create post lists. This sort of independent experimentation with non-bluesky lexicons is one of the most exciting things to me about third-party clients, most of which do very little. One easy lift in my opinion would be to allow reactions other than just likes. Emojis would be easy, but they could also be moth themed moods.

Anyways, huge shoutout to dame for building this incredible client from scratch,

https://goose.leaflet.pub/3lwwlwjw5vk2z