Is Disclosure and Certification of the Use of Generative AI Really Necessary? | Judicature

judicature.duke.edu

2 pages link to this URL

Pro Se 7. Kruse v. Karlen (Missouri). "More egregiously, we now turn to the actual authorities cited by Appellant." 22 fake cases.

AI & Law by Midwest Frontier AI Consulting Chad Ratashak Dec 12, 2025

Pro se litigant filed improperly formatted briefs after deadline extensions, and cited 24 cases total: 22 nonexistent cases and 2 cases cited did not stand for the proposition.

1 inbound link article en

Pro Se 8. Martin v. Taylor County (N.D. Texas). "...he had the opportunity to plead his best case through his roughly 500 pages in filings."

AI & Law by Midwest Frontier AI Consulting Chad Ratashak Jan 1, 2026

Pro se litigant filed excessively long filing. The Court concluded that none of the claims had merit. Preceded N.D. Texas Local Rules on GenAI Disclosure later in 2024, but after Judge Starr's Order.

0 inbound links article en