AI badly needs a dose of skepticism
Some scientists are too eager to believe their own claims
Towards end-to-end automation of AI research - Nature
nature.comAn artificial intelligence system can produce research papers with minimal human involvement, even passing the first round of peer review for the workshop of a main machine learning conference.
What will a researcher be? Or: How I learned to stop worrying and love the epistemological bomb
A paper published in Nature last week described an AI system that can conceive, execute, and write up research with no humans in the loop – and get it through peer review. This isn’t a …
A Computer Scientist in a Business School
Random thoughts of a computer scientist who is working behind the enemy lines; and lately turned into a double agent.
AI Slop Is Flooding Academic Journals. A Top Journal Measured It
A top management journal measured AI’s impact on submissions and reviews. Submissions rose 42%, writing quality declined and AI reviews proved uninformative to editors.
Can AI Really Build Better AI?
Recursive self-improvement is emerging, but humans are still in the loop