The paper explores how well AI algorithms can fare with regards to intellectual virtues compared to humans. The paper argues that if intellectual virtues are understood functionally as displaying behavior similar to human virtuous behavior, AI algorithms likely can exceed humans in unbiased perception and non-stereotypical thinking. Doing so would give them an edge over humans with regard to visual accuracy and fairness. Humans likely will have a lasting edge with regards to other intellectual virtues like creativity and intellectual autonomy.
One of the biggest problems with measuring AI progress is the ambiguity of measuring intelligence itself. AGI is treated as a milestone we have yet to cross, but there is no central definition of AGI. Depending on who you ask, AGI is achieved when a system: * can fool humans into